Civil law part 1. MU Witte MIEMP Control 2

Affiliates: 0,05 $how to earn
Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Buy this item cheaper:
Sold: 0
Uploaded: 04.02.2018


Civil Law Part 1. MU Witte MIEMP Verification 2. (Themes 18-19)
Rated 85/100 Good

Verification work 2. (themes 18-19)
Two problems are proposed for the solution. The answers should have a thought-out logical structure, contain references to the regulatory framework used for the decision, with mandatory indication of the paragraphs and numbers of articles of the legal act.
It is necessary to answer only the questions posed, but for everyone without exception. If the respondent has a dissenting opinion, this can also be reflected in the response.
The maximum score is 10 (one task is 5 points). In the case of incomplete or incorrect solution of the problem, the number of points is reduced.

Exercise 1
JSC "Avtostroy" filed a lawsuit against the LLC "Virineya" to recover under a lease agreement non-residential premises 58500 rubles. In support of the claim, the plaintiff pointed out that VIRENEIA LLC had addressed to OJSC with a letter about the provision of a non-residential warehouse space on a lease, signed by the sales department manager.
The room was provided, but no rent was received.
The respondent indicated that he did not satisfy the plaintiff´s claim on the grounds that the request (letter No. 278) is not a lease contract.

Your questions
1. In what form are contracts concluded on behalf of a legal entity and by whom do they subscribe?
2. Is the employee entitled to make transactions without a power of attorney on behalf of a legal entity?
3. Is it possible to treat the contract as a prisoner?
4. If this transaction is recognized invalid by the court, then which one: disputable or insignificant?

Activity 2
The wholesale store received grapes from a private railway company from the railroad in a glacier car. The cargo arrived spoiled. The buyer filed a claim to the seller, refusing to pay in full the entire amount established by the contract.
Zagotkontora in response to the claim to her stated that according to the control information about the ice supply, on the way the car was supplied with ice irregularly, and demanded to pay the entire amount established by the contract.

Your questions
1. What are the grounds for the responsibility of entrepreneurs for non-fulfillment of obligations?
2. Is there any liability for damage to the seller?
3. Is the buyer´s claim legitimate?


No feedback yet.
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)