Civil law (Test 2 task)

Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 0

Content: 16,71 kB


8 pages

1. Test
Choose the correct answer:
1. Who is responsible for damage caused by minors under the age of 14 years (the general rule)?
1. Parents
2. guardianship authorities
3. The actual teachers
4. caregivers and medical institutions
2. Subject to any compensation for damage caused incapacitated citizens?
1. Yes
2. No
3. To whom are obliged to compensate for damage caused by a source of danger?
1. on the causer
2. the owner of the source of increased danger
4. In what form are the author's contracts?
1. Oral
2. Simple Written
3. a written notarized
5. When the Russian steel related rights protected?
1. since 1992.
2. since 1993.
3. from 1995.
6. It is not allowed the adoption of the inheritance:
1. under the condition
2. Qualified
3. fully
4. through a representative

Objective 1
Fedunov Gribova specified in the will as the executor of the will and given at the time of acceptance of the will of this, demanded from the debtor repayment of the testator. The debtor has refused to pay the debt, saying in a dispute to the court that the plaintiff Fedunov is inappropriate because it does not have the authority executor of the will, and that the mere reference in the will that he is the executor of the will is not enough.
The (what document) certifying the powers of testamentary executor? On whose behalf he is entitled to conduct business related to the execution of the will?
Can the executor, giving his consent to the execution of the will in the commission of a will to refuse to perform the functions executor after the opening of the inheritance?
Does the executor of the right to compensation?

Task 2
As a result of careless storage of flammable substances in the summer cottage belonging to Nikolaev, a fire broke out. Fire covered dilapidated farm buildings and equipment are in them and supplies of firewood. The owner of the neighboring plot, Trifonov, noting the approach to the fire in the territory of its plot structure, tried to draw attention to the situation of Nikolayev, but, convinced of the futility of his efforts, he began to extinguish the fire with all available means. As a result of his actions, and the neighbors came to the rescue aid the fire was extinguished. Buildings owned Trifonov, the harm was caused, but he Trifonov received numerous burns of moderate severity. In addition, the clothes in which he was dressed Trifonov, fallen into disrepair.
Assuming that the action it can be considered perfect in the interests of Nikolayev, Trifonov turned to him with a demand for compensation for the cost of damaged clothing, as well as the recovery of the costs of treatment for burns. Lawyer Nikolaev believed that the charges against the requirements not be satisfied, because the action can not be considered Trifonova committed solely in the interests of Nikolayev, as were committed above all to prevent damage to the property of the Trifonov. Meanwhile, the obligation to compensate for necessary expenses and other actual damages law confers on the person in whose interests the victim worked. In the interests of the Nikolaev can be considered a perfect action to save his property, and the amount of compensation in any case, should not exceed the value of the property, which is extremely low.
Do not come to an agreement, the parties went to court.
Solve the case.

List of references


No feedback yet.
1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)