Контрольная по гражданско-процессуальному праву.

Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 0

Content: 39.rar 13,92 kB


Objective 1
The district court of Voronezh a criminal case on charges Knyazev in committing an offense under paragraphs "e" and "e" h. 2 tablespoons. 112 of the Criminal Code. As stated, the public prosecutor, September 15, 2007 the defendant of hooliganism and motivated by racial hatred, while at the tram stop, caused moderate injury citizen of the Republic of Liberia Franz Nairobi, namely, struck him in the face with brass knuckles and a few kicks in the chest, resulting in fracture of the mandible were two ribs.
From the materials of the criminal case indicated that late at night on September 15 in one of the district hospitals of Voronezh did the young man blacks with broken jaw and ribs. He was taken to a hospital emergency room staff, caused by a tram driver Pimenov. Subsequently Pimenov told the investigator that on the evening on September 15 while on the tram route, and approaching the stop, saw a man of strong physique, standing at the bus stop and something to talk to those who stood in the same young man negro appearance, took from his pocket some object and hit the Negro in the face, and when he fell - gave him a few more kicks to the chest. Subsequently Pimenov identified Knyazev.
Nairobi victim told investigators that he is a student of the Voronezh State University. The evening of 15 September, he cart-rotated to the hostel and waited at the tram stop. At this time he was approached by a young man in a drunken state, which was in the form of obscene shouting at him racist insults. And when the victim tried to calm approached, the latter pulled out a subject similar to brass knuckles, and hit him in the face. Thereafter Nairobi collapsed. Subsequently, the victim was identified Knyazev.
A forensic medical examination found that the fracture of the lower jaw, we and ribs resulted from blows with blunt hard object.
Arrested on suspicion of committing a crime Knyazev confessed. However, later (after charge) he said that that night was drunk and does not remember anything. The same position he occupied, and during the confrontation with the victim. And in the hearing, he refused to do anything to report on the matter.
During the arrest Knyazev was found and seized the brass knuckles.
Summoned to the investigator friend Knyazev said that he hates blacks persons and when he was drunk, frequently shouting "I will kill them all."
However, due at the request of defense counsel in the trial of the defendant's mother said she always instilled her son love to people of other nationalities, had never heard from him these racist statements. Moreover, it is presented to the court a personal diary son, who he was, going to school in the early 80s. In this diary defendant in particular he pointed out that when I grow up, he wants to go to South Africa to help fight the black population to the colonial regime.
1. Determine what kind of evidence was obtained in the course of the preliminary investigation and the judicial investigation in the criminal case. Also specify the type of each proof in terms of classification.
2. Evaluate the adequacy of the evidence obtained to recognize the person guilty of an incriminated prestuple¬niya.
3. What is the ruling in this criminal case the judge must take? Explain your answer.
Task 2
The Investigation Department of the Internal Affairs to investigate criminal case against Karpov at h. 2 tablespoons. 111 of the Criminal Code. During the preliminary investigation were questioned two witnesses, showed that they saw the accused while intoxicated, tried to break the glass in the tobacco kiosk, and when the seller tried to subdue him kiosk - drew from his pocket a gun and shot him in the eye. Questioned on the criminal de

Additional information

Задача 3
Судебной коллегией по уголовным делам Ярославского областного суда было рассмотрено кассационное представление прокурора на оправдательный приговор районного суда области по делу Плотникова и Корнеева, обвиняемых в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч. 3 ст. 159 УК РФ. В результате оправдательный приговор был отменен и уголовное дело направлено на новое судебное разбирательство в суд 1-й инстанции в другом составе.
На данное кассационное определение в президиум Ярославского областного суда поступили две надзорные жалобы защитников оправданных.
Так, защитник оправданного Плотникова в своей жалобе указал, что кассационное представление прокурора касалось только необоснованного оправдания Корнеева, однако суд отменил приговор и в части оправдания его подзащитного.
В свою очередь защитник Корнеева указывал на то, что за время, про-шедшее с момента постановления приговора, государственный обвинитель попросил следователя раздобыть некоторые дополнительные материалы (определенные финансовые документы), подтверждающие виновность его подзащитного. Следователь провел выемку данных материалов, представил их прокурору, а тот — в обоснование своего представления сослался на них при кассационном рассмотрении дела.
Помимо этого, защитник обращал внимание на тот факт, что суд кассационной инстанции, исследуя существо прокурорского представления, вызвал и допросил в качестве свидетеля одного из судей, рассматривающих дело в 1-й инстанции, оставшегося в меньшинстве и написавшего особое мнение.
И, наконец, надзорная жалоба содержала указания на то обстоятельство, что председательствующий в судебном заседании, огласив кассационное определение, сказал обоим оправданным: «Ребята, я вижу, что вы тут натворили дел, поэтому добьюсь, чтобы вас засадили лет на восемь...».
1. Оцените обоснованность доводов, содержащихся в надзорных жалобах защитников.
2. Должен ли суд надзорной инстанции принять данные жалобы к рассмотрению? Какое решение должен принять суд надзорной инстанции, рассмотрев это уголовное дело? Аргументируйте свой ответ.


No feedback yet.
1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)