September 25 Polzunov appealed to the head

Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 0
Uploaded: 04.07.2019
Content: S19-013.docx 15,76 kB

Description

On September 25, Polzunov complained to the head of the police department about the actions of the traffic police officers, stating that on September 1 he had registered a VAZ-2110 car belonging to the traffic police when checking out documents and when inspecting the vehicle, the police officers stated that there were signs of a change in the engine number, in connection with which, he had the documents for the vehicle removed and the car itself was placed on a special parking lot.
On November 10, the head of the police department refused to let Polzunov consider his complaint, because, firstly, the necessary evidence was not attached to the complaint, and, secondly, the actions of the employees in the complaint were called “uniform arbitrariness”, therefore he has the right not to consider such a complaint.
Polzunov appealed the actions of the police officers to the district court.
What decision should make the court? Are the actions of traffic police lawful? Is the established procedure for filing and reviewing an administrative complaint?

Additional information

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2004-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.

Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)