Test

Affiliates: 0,21 $how to earn
Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Buy this item cheaper:
Sold: 0

Content: 49.rar 20,31 kB

Description

Control work on the discipline "Financial Law" 4 assignments

Task number 1
Based on the analysis of part three of the Budget Code of the Russian Federation, the Budget Code of the Russian Federation of July 31, 1998 No. 145-FZ (as of February 15, 2013), develop a scheme or a whole series of schemes that reveal the stages of budget execution and budget control. Pay attention to the completeness of the reflection in the diagrams of the essential elements of the budget process, which include, in particular, participants, terms, stages of the budgetary process, types of acts, the sequence of actions to be performed.

Task number 2
The Tax Inspectorate found that JSC "TVK" unnecessarily transferred to the budget 2,500 rubles VAT and, without informing the taxpayer, the indicated amount of the overpayment against future tax payments. Are the actions of a tax authority lawful?
Another variant. JSC filed an application for the return of the specified amount of overpayment. Is it possible to refund if the JSC has a shortfall in the income tax in the amount of 1,500 rubles in arrears in the income tax in the amount of 1,500 rubles. If yes, in what size?
Do the tax authorities have to make a refund if there is an overpayment to the regional budget and a shortfall in the federal budget?

Task number 3
Make a full regulatory and legal analysis of all actions of participants in legal relations; To confirm the legality or illegality of decisions of officials; Find at least 10 violations of tax laws.
On February 8, 2002, the head of the department of on-site tax inspections of the MNS inspectorate in the Kirov district of Krasnoyarsk decided to conduct an on-site tax audit for 000 "Sibiryak" and its branch located in the Central District of Krasnoyarsk. The subject of the audit is the legality of calculating, withholding and payment of personal income tax for the period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1999 inclusive. Ten days after the decision was taken, the inspection team of tax inspectors arrived at the LLC and, having presented the above decision, demanded to allow them to enter the territory of the enterprise for tax inspection. Employees of the JSC refused for some time to let inspectors pass to the territory, arguing that, firstly, the controllers did not present all the necessary documents; Secondly, six months ago the enterprise had already conducted a tax audit of the personal income tax for the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000 inclusive. The head of the audit team warned: if such illegal actions continue, he has the right to immediately make a decision to hold LLC to liability under Article 124 of the Tax Code and impose a penalty of up to 60 times the minimum wage.
During the inspection, the territories were inspected, documents were retrieved and seized, and corresponding protocols were drawn up. In his remarks to the protocols, the taxpayer indicated the following: when a warehouse was inspected, a video was recorded, which is not provided for by the NK and therefore illegal; Excavation done at night; Officials of tax authorities were used as witnesses; The business correspondence of the enterprise and other materials not related to taxation were confiscated.
On May 10, 2002, the audit was completed, its subject and terms were recorded in a certificate. Six months after drawing up the certificate, according to the results of the audit, an act was drawn up, which indicates the facts of numerous tax violations in the part of paying the personal income tax. The taxpayer was not acquainted with the act. The next day after drawing up the act of tax audit, the tax inspectorate appealed to the district court with a claim for recovery of tax sanctions from Sibiryak. Having examined the materials of the case, the court ruled to bring the taxpayer accountable for part 2 of Article 122 of the Tax Code.null

Additional information

Task number 4 During the tax audit of OJSC Vest, significant violations of tax legislation were found, including withholding and transfer to the budget of the personal income tax received at the place of work. The latter was expressed in the deliberate concealment of the enterprise part of the amounts paid to employees on fixed-term employment contracts, resulting in a shortfall of 200,000 rubles. According to the court decision, tax sanctions were applied to OJSC West in accordance with part 1 of Article 122 of the Tax Code in the form of a fine of 40,000 rubles. Is the judgment correct?null

Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
Period
1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)